With less 100 hours until Election Day, Democratic candidate Dan Feehan spent Friday visiting supporters in Owatonna to thank them for their tireless work throughout his campaign for the 1st Congressional District seat.
The Mankato resident said that while Steele County tends to vote red – or Republican – in elections, he refuses to pigeonhole any voter by a color or party, stating that is what leads to the division he is trying to fight as he challenges U.S. Rep. Jim Hagedorn for the second time.
“I believe southern Minnesota is very independent minded, sure Trump won in 2016, but we voted for Obama twice, and for George W. Bush twice before that,” Feehan said in Owatonna on Friday afternoon. “I think southern Minnesotans are exhausted and sick and tired of being placed in one camp or the other, when you hear someone say you are red or blue, that is divisive politics, which is why I’m running in the first place.”
In 2018, Feehan and Hagedorn faced off in one of the tightest political races of the year, with Hagedorn edging out Feehan by only 1,315 votes for the seat that Democrat Tim Walz gave up for his successful run for governor. In Steele County, however, Hagedorn’s victory was double-digit, capturing 56% of Steele County voters to Feehan’s 44%. Still, Democratic strategists consider Feehan their best bet to flip a Minnesota district this year.
The political news organization Politico considered the race between the two a tossup earlier in October.
The Republican Party has been heavily targeting southern Minnesota recently, with several visits from President Donald Trump occurring in the region. Feehan said the focus on southern Minnesota, as well as the direct attacks that have been circulating against him and other Democratic candidates, is an obvious sign that the party feels threatened by their chances come Tuesday.
“We stand a positive chance to make change and demand change,” Feehan said. “Leaders should lead and bring unity – when you are in charge you need to be in charge. The millions of dollars in dark money that is being spent to target southern Minnesota right now is sending us the message that we are right on track to make those changes.”
It was over a year ago when Feehan first announced that he would be making a second run against Hagedorn for the congressional seat, long before the COVID-19 pandemic changed every aspect of life. Though campaigning during the pandemic has been different and has presented interesting challenges along the way, Feehan said he feels confident that he is making his voice heard in the district.
“This year has been hard, but we are working on building a sense of hope,” Feehan said, adding that he views serving in Congress as a public service. “In general 2020 has been an upsetting year out of our control, but this is one thing you can do and can control.”
“Get out there and vote,” he continued. “The most upsetting thing is when I hear people say their vote doesn’t matter, but it does – no matter who you vote for. And if I win, I will work just as hard to work for those who didn’t vote for me as those who did. We have to be able to disagree and still get stuff done, there is no other option.”
During a record-breaking year for early voting in Minnesota, Thursday’s appellate court decision to segregate absentee ballots received after 8 p.m. on Election Day is weighing heavy on the minds of local election officials.
“Do not put your ballot in the mail,” said Denise Anderson, Rice County auditor and election director. “If you haven’t mailed it to us yet, don’t do it – just don’t put it in the mail.”
A three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday that absentee ballots arriving in the seven-day grace period after Election Day in Minnesota should be separated from other ballots. It doesn’t invalidate absentee ballots that are received after Election Day, but it signals that a campaign could be successful if it challenges the validity of those ballots after the election, Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon said in a Friday press conference. Simon announced late Friday afternoon that he wasn’t going to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.
“We disagree with the court’s decision, and there may be cause for litigation later,” Simon said in a statement.
A total of 1.7 million absentee ballots have been requested in Minnesota as of Friday, which Simon called “record shattering,” and more than 388,000 of them were still outstanding on Friday. He noted that historically, a large amount of absentee ballots are returned in the two to three days before an election.
“The No. 1 thing voters should know is if they have an absentee ballot in hand right now or they ordered one and it isn’t there yet or they’re about to have it in hand, do not place it in the mail. It is too risky at this point,” Simon said.
What voters should do now
Steele County Auditor Laura Ihrke said to be on the safe side, voters have one of two options: drop off their absentee ballots directly at their county auditor’s offices or show up to the polls on Election Day.
“You cannot bring your mail-in ballot to the polling place, you have to bring them to the auditor’s office by 3 p.m. on Election Day,” Ihrke said, adding that the 8 p.m. Tuesday deadline is for when the postmaster will deliver ballots already in the mail. “Stop putting them in the mail, drop them off here or vote in person.”
Voters can check the status of their absentee ballot on the Minnesota Secretary of State’s voting website, sos.state.mn.us/elections-voting. If it shows that their ballot hasn’t arrived at the county auditor’s office yet, a resident can vote in person early or on Election Day and that will cancel out their absentee ballot that’s still in the mail, Simon said.
County auditor offices will be open from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. Saturday for in-person early voting and absentee ballot drop off. In-person early voting ends at the end of the business day on Monday.
Polls will be open on Election Day from 7 a.m.-8 p.m. Tuesday. Residents can find their polling locations on the Minnesota Secretary of State’s website.
The seven-day extension had previously been approved in both state and federal courts due to the COVID-19 pandemic and safety concerns of people who sit in the high-risk category for contracting the virus. Ihrke said polling locations across the state are taking the pandemic seriously, implementing social distancing standards and frequent cleaning and sanitizing procedures to ensure voter safety.
“All the judges are thoroughly trained to keep everyone safe,” Ihrke said. “We just ask that voters be patient as we work hard to both keep them safe and get their votes counted.”
Unreturned absentee ballots
Anderson noted that Rice County has roughly 2,900 absentee ballots that have not yet been returned. She said the decision by the court on Thursday is unfortunate for absentee voters who have been operating under the impression that they had more time.
“For the voters I feel bad for them, I feel sad,” Anderson said. “They have been told since September that as long as they had their ballots postmarked on Election Day that it would still count, even if it took seven days to get to us. I feel bad for that, because making your vote count is what’s most important.”
In Steele County, 8,518 people have either mailed in their absentee ballots or voted early in person and about 1,000 absentee ballots were still outstanding as of Friday, according to Ihrke. That breaks the previous record of a little more than 3,000 of the 22,000 registered voters using absentee ballots in an election.
Ihrke said the average voter turnout in Steele County during presidential elections is roughly 82%, meaning nearly half of the average turnout has already submitted their votes. The case is similar in Rice County, where about 38% of the 39,500 registered voters have already voted by either absentee or in-person. Anderson said the average voter turnout in Rice County for presidential elections is about 85%, and though there is still a large number of unreturned absentee ballots, she’s not too concerned about how that could impact the results.
“I’m not nervous because you always expect that some of the ballots you mail out won’t come back,” Anderson said. “Some of these people might decide to go to the polls, so they might never come back.”
Other Election Day issues
President Donald Trump has pushed unsubstantiated claims in recent months about voter fraud occurring with mail-in ballots. In Minnesota, however, Anderson said voters shouldn’t lose sleep over the idea.
“We have the most secure system out there,” Anderson said. “With all the testing done prior to the election and the public accuracy being out there for everyone to view, plus we always have paper back up. Our system is solid.”
Ihrke agreed with Anderson, adding that the canvassing board’s audits of election results after Election Day shows the true integrity of the voting system and the steps taken to prevent fraud.
“Voting twice is a felony – you will get caught,” Ihrke said. “Don’t even try it.”
News broke earlier this week that the Minneapolis police union was searching for “poll challengers” at the request of a Trump official. Simon said state law is clear that political parties, not campaigns or candidates, can have one challenger in a polling location and that person is designated in writing. A challenger cannot come within six feet of a voter or speak to a voter, and can only challenge a voter in writing based on personal knowledge, not on hunches or guesses, Simon said.
No one who isn’t authorized to be in a polling location can come within 100 feet of a polling location, Simon said.
Simon said any voters who encounter problems with someone at a polling location on Tuesday should bring it to the attention of the election judges.
Tuesday is the final day for Owatonna school district residents to decide whether or not they support two funding requests to fund the district’s operational costs.
Superintendent Jeff Elstad has reminded voters to flip the ballot over because the district’s levy questions are on the ballot’s backside.
The first question asks for a renewal of the district’s current operating levy, which will be expiring in June 2021. The homeowner of an average-priced home of $175,000 would see a tax increase of 50 cents per month in 2021 with an inflation adjustment, an Owatonna Public Schools new release says.
The money will be used for classroom instruction, supplies and staffing among other operating expenses.
The second question asks for an increase in the district’s operating levy that would be phased in first starting in 2022 and then again in 2025. The tax increase on an average-priced home would be about $10 per month, according to the district.
“We are asking our community to consider reinventing at $300 per student, which means we’re going to phase in that impact for the next 10 years,” Elstad said.
Funds would help maintain programming, appropriate class sizes and career/technical opportunities for students into the future. This second question is contingent on the first question’s passing.
“If question one passes and question two does not, we’ll have to go back out again next November to ask because just the renewal is not sustainable financially for us as a school district,” Elstad said.
Elstad said the district has already cut millions of dollars in a “shared approach.”
About 14% of the district’s funding comes from property taxes and local sources, the rest comes from state and federal government, according to the Owatonna Public Schools Finance Facts website. However, state funding has not kept up with inflation and the cost of education over the years, said Amanda Heilman, director of finance and operations. If state funding had kept up with inflation, Heilman says the district would have received an additional $3 million last year alone.
If the questions are not approved, the district will face at least $8.5 million in total budget cuts from 2020 through 2023. This would result in increased class sizes, teacher layoffs, cuts to various support services, cuts to academics, activities, athletics and music programs.
However, if both of the requests are approved the district will still make $5.25 million in cuts from 2020-21 through 2022-23 as part of the shared approach.
“If question one and question two were to pass, it provides us financial stability for the next 10 years up through the 2030-31 school year,” Elstad said.
More information about the levy questions can be found at www.isd761.org/our-district/levy. A tax impact calculator can also be found on the levy website.
Two building bonds have passed since the 2013 operating levy passed, but those funds can only be used on building and facility projects and not on operating expenses.
The questions voters will see on their ballot are:
Q1: The board of Independent School District No. 761 (Owatonna Public Schools), Minnesota has proposed to renew the existing referendum revenue authorization of $482.90 per pupil, subject to an annual increase at the rate of inflation, that is scheduled to expire after taxes payable in 2020. The renewed referendum revenue authorization would be first levied in 2020 for taxes payable in 2021 and applicable for ten (10) years unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law.
Shall the renewal of the expiring referendum revenue authorization proposed by the Board of Independent School District No. 761 (Owatonna Public Schools), Minnesota be approved?
Q2: The board of Independent School District No. 761 (Owatonna Public Schools), Minnesota has proposed to increase the School District’s referendum revenue authorization by the following amounts per pupil for taxes payable in the years specified:
$300 per pupil, subject to an annual increase at the rate of inflation, for taxes payable in 2022 through 2024
an additional $300 per pupil, subject to an annual increase at the rate of inflation, for taxes payable in 2025 through 2030
The proposed new referendum revenue authorizations would be applicable for nine (9) years unless otherwise revoked or reduced as provided by law.
If School District Question 1 is approved, shall the new referendum revenue authorizations proposed by the board of Independent School District No. 761 (Owatonna Public Schools), Minnesota be approved?